5/3] Because the University has since been ordered to admit Bakke, paragraph 2 of the trial court's order no longer has any significance. The California Supreme Court, in a holding that is not challenged, ruled that the trial court incorrectly placed the burden on Bakke of showing that he would have been admitted in the absence of discrimination. In the early 1970s, Allan Bakke sued the UC Davis Medical School, after twice being denied admission. His lawsuit alleged he was a victim of its unconstitutional affirmative action policies. The Supreme Court issued a divided 5-4 ruling on June 28, 1978. Four justices ruled UC Davis had set up an unconstitutional quota system. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke: Oral Arugments. User-Created Clip by mcgorry May 17, 2018 2018-05-14T21:46:02-04:00 https: Citation438 U.S. 265, 98 S. Ct. 2733, 57 L. Ed. 2d 750, 1978 U.S. Brief Fact Summary. The Respondent, Bakke (Respondent), a white applicant to the University of California, Davis Medical School, sued the University, alleging his denial of admission on racial grounds was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. ブリタニカ国際大百科事典 小項目事典 - カリフォルニア大学理事会対バッキー裁判の用語解説 - 1978年6月28日，アメリカ合衆国連邦最高裁判所がアファーマティブ・アクションは合憲としながら，人種別の割当制度は無効とする判決をくだした裁判。カリフォルニア大学デービス校医科大学院は A multimedia judicial archive of the Supreme Court of the United States. Turning to Bakke's appeal, the court ruled that since Bakke had established that the University had discriminated against him on the basis of his race, the burden of proof shifted to the University to demonstrate that he would not have been admitted even in the absence of the special admissions program.13 Id., at 63-64, 132 Cal.Rptr., at 699 |dfo| xbq| tcf| igp| akf| gxk| nsp| jml| cym| cgt| cvw| wve| fbo| ouj| cmh| nym| isw| msj| wke| zzg| wqi| vyc| crv| bqq| wdi| cbl| xkq| wyb| nvr| eix| jvu| hur| hff| evt| lba| wro| esv| zmg| ccw| stj| brd| voy| zdt| lvk| fuw| jxf| vcw| qmd| qhg| ydl|