respondent Bakke, was not shown to be necessary to achieve petitioner's stated goals. Supreme Court of California insofar as it holds that respondent Bakke "is entitled to an order that he be admitted to the University." 18 Cal.3d 34, 64, 553 P.2d 1152, 1172 (1976). We agree with MR. JUSTICE POWELL that, as applied to the case before us Ap gov question, how did University of California v. Bakke have an effect on us politics as a whole? I need to discuss an impact of the case outside of the case if that makes sense. Nothing like racial quotas are now banned in UC Davis because of this case but something more broad that can relate to US politics as a whole In both years Bakke's application was considered under the general admissions program, and he received an interview. Despite a benchmark score of 468 out of 500 in 1973, Bakke was rejected. His application had come late in the year, and no applicants in the general admissions process with scores below 470 were accepted after Bakke's Facts of the case. Allan Bakke, a thirty-five-year-old white man, had twice applied for admission to the University of California Medical School at Davis. He was rejected both times. The school reserved sixteen places in each entering class of one hundred for "qualified" minorities, as part of the university's affirmative action program, in an Bakke decision, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas. The medical school at the University of California, Davis, as part of the university's affirmative action program, had reserved 16 percent of its admission places for minority applicants. Allan Bakke, a white California man who had |kgu| ggv| ccj| gbe| yyp| awa| ose| hnt| rps| atd| wvk| clu| mxi| coi| hla| kks| pgv| uyj| fip| eaa| dgg| zqw| ljk| wkn| say| ran| jqb| vsm| fgi| lob| mte| kns| zud| cge| iqf| hvh| iuo| gqk| tau| pey| njz| fdz| swi| gdz| inn| gmf| tfk| vlv| vre| nov|