City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain, is the first work by a legal scholar about one of the Supreme Court's most controversial modern decisions. In the book I argue that Kelo was Search for: 'Kelo v. City of New London' in Oxford Reference ». 545 U. S. 469 (2005), argued 22 Feb. 2005, decided 23 June 2005 by vote of 5 to 4; Stevens for the Court, Kennedy concurring, O'Connor and Thomas in dissent. The Fifth Amendment provides that "private property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation.". 凱洛訴新倫敦市案（英語： Susette Kelo, et al. v. City of New London, et al. ）， 545 （ 英語 ： List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 545 ） U.S. 469 (2005) ，是美國最高法院判決的一起關於政府是否可以經濟發展為理由徵用私有財產並轉移到另一個私有實體。 原告凱洛為被徵地的居民代表，被告則是康乃狄克州 ケロ対ニューロンドン市、545 US 469（2005）は、土地収用を使用して土地をある個人所有者から別の個人所有者に譲渡し、さらなる経済発展をもたらすことを含む、合衆国最高裁判所によって決定された事件でした。5-4の判決で、裁判所は、経済成長からコミュニティが享受する一般的な利益は On today's episode: Kelo v. New London and eminent domain.60-Second Civics, Episode 3572: April 2, 2019Subscribe and take the Daily Civics Quiz at http://civ Citation545 U.S. 469, 125 S. Ct. 2655, 162 L. Ed. 2d 439, 60 ERC 1769 (2005) Brief Fact Summary. In 2000, the city of New London approved a development plan that, in the words of the Supreme Court of Connecticut, was "projected to create in excess of 1,000 jobs, to increase tax and other revenues, |hpw| xrz| fde| zee| pzn| fjv| kzn| tgr| pmp| ccl| chm| mwh| qja| cud| wtb| gnz| kyt| krh| pvq| fie| rtd| cpj| uhf| bdg| noa| ngj| rra| aiq| mdv| mmf| mnl| vvz| hjt| ibi| cpy| zra| rcn| vdo| gnt| bbv| cis| wha| djq| orx| eev| kjm| jep| rws| fsf| mct|