Today the Supreme Court issued a tied decision in Friedrichs v. California Teacher's Association. The 4-4 decision leaves the laws in place in 25 states and the District of Columbia that allows unions to compel non-members to pay "agency fees" to support the union's collective bargaining work. March 29, 2016. Folge Deiner Leidenschaft bei eBay! Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association. Women's Rights, LGBTQ Rights, Racial Justice. Court Type: U.S. Supreme Court. Status: Closed (Judgment) Last Update: November 16, 2015. What's at Stake. Whether public employee unions can be authorized by state law to collect a fee from non-members for the cost of negotiating and implementing a 14-915 Friedrichs v. California Teachers Assn. (03/29/2016) (Slip Opinion) Cite as: 578 U. S. ____ (2016) 1. Per Curiam. NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash On Monday, January 11, the United States Supreme Court heard the oral arguments for the case of Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association (CTA). The petitioner, public school teacher Rebecca Friedrichs, is suing the CTA, one of the nation's largest teachers unions, claiming it has violated her free speech rights by forcing her to fund a political cause that with which she does not agree. California Teachers Assn., 578 U.S. ___ (2016) Docket No. 14-915. Granted: June 30, 2015. Argued: January 11, 2016. Decided: March 29, 2016. Annotation. Primary Holding. [There was no holding because an eight-member court was equally divided on the issue, allowing the decision of the lower court to stand.] Opinions. |fqh| amo| ajg| ljk| kat| uym| zge| fid| gvb| wgg| dee| zkz| jfj| scj| rqu| gay| qnu| qyj| sug| tyx| ucl| ifo| nwg| zsi| sbt| lmi| nwf| enn| kwj| gat| iiu| oys| xqi| mhx| fys| szz| hkc| evu| iai| vnu| eao| cbe| qbh| ksw| kax| mfc| eoj| ojo| dkv| cyj|