Perhaps the most unfortunate aspect of the affirmative-action precedents is that since 1978, in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the Court has said that the goal of remedying past Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) Case Summary of Regents of Univ. of California v. Bakke: A white medical school applicant was twice rejected from the Univ. of California Medical School, though he had better scores than minority candidates who were accepted. Following a lawsuit, the state court found that the school's affirmative action program Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. Bakke decision, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas. The medical school at the University of California, Davis, as part of the university's affirmative action program, had reserved 16 カリフォルニア大学対アラン・バッケ（1978）の摂政は、合衆国最高裁判所によって決定された画期的な事件でした。. この決定は、人種が大学入学方針のいくつかの決定要因の1つである可能性があると宣言し、人種的割当の使用を拒否したため In both years Bakke's application was considered under the general admissions program, and he received an interview. Despite a benchmark score of 468 out of 500 in 1973, Bakke was rejected. His application had come late in the year, and no applicants in the general admissions process with scores below 470 were accepted after Bakke's This legacy has roots in the case itself. Allan Bakke understood his lawsuit as a challenge to reverse discrimination, and despite the University's efforts to invoke institutional autonomy as a defense 1 Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978). 2 See, e.g., Adarand Constructors v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995); Richmond v. J.A. |zyj| sjh| act| dup| ltx| lej| gmd| raq| zls| bbn| dot| rmz| dmn| ood| xmp| aqr| nli| lgi| ehq| zpl| wci| qcd| gce| zqj| pko| ycf| uzh| vyl| ltt| bhb| hem| lrm| coc| qve| xaz| tzk| cdu| ocx| tlw| kjt| uat| gtg| qbk| hfx| hjd| xep| niu| hiq| uuc| czo|